The logo for Block Party surrounded by tiny icons such as apps, a location pin, an X, and a retweet symbol

The Washington Post

TF-BROWSERLAWFOLLOW

0906-tf-BROWSERLAW

An illustration using the Permission Slip logo and privacy icons.

1003-helpdesk-GETPRIVACY

laser printer

ILLUSTRATION

An illustration of a chat bubble sweeping data under the rug.

0609-TF-PrivacyDual

Capitol Hill

0517-helpdesk-premom

A collage with a hand, stethoscope, and chat bubbles

helpdesk-GPTHEALTH

A figure holding a phone hits a money box.

0131-helpdesk-datadividend

An illustrated collage with the Twitter logo and security icons. 

helpdesk-privacy-reset-guide-twitter

hd-privatetexts

misinfoTips

Wales Daily Life 2022

Contributor

Getty

Help Desk Google Search

0926-publicwifi

Thanksgiving Travel Returns To Near Pre-Pandemic Volumes Across U.S.

Staff

INAPPBROWSERS

Respond to prefers-color-scheme dark in app web views

Whether leaderboard ad sticky behavior is disabled

Follow section front redirects in Spectrum

Enable NLP source in PCS for load testing

Switch off the News Alerts Survey Widget when we have enough responses

Poll to determine if new LUF updates are available

Allows the winning A/B test variant to be turned on without Spectrum deployment

Show expanded byline information on articles

Show infinite scrolling sections in Assembler MultiView

Show option for NLP article summaries in Action Bar

Show NLP summaries collection recirc on article pages

A general feature flag for Recipe Features that aren't yet released

Show the Balance of Power component on the new Election subnav component

Feature flag for media team features that aren't yet released

Enable new Elections subnav on Site pages

Use new Orca video player for preroll plugin in Spectrum

If true, will use a spoofed user agent to scrape and summarize content from paywalled sources

flip back to old full page reload when new updates come in

Show the snow tracker (instead of the heat tracker) on Spectrum

Trump transition live updates: President-elect raises prospect of pardons for Jan. 6 crimes

Trump Campaign

Big Tech news and how to take control of your data and devices

See more on this topic in your recommendations

Technology

Tips delivered to your inbox twice weekly

The Tech Friend newsletter

Technology alerts

Business and Tech alerts

Kamil Krzaczynski

With holiday travel hitting record highs, you might be tempted to pay for a service that lets you skip the airport line.

Clear fits the bill: The $199-per-year subscription lets you walk straight to the front. Just make sure you read the fine print.

Airport security is, by nature, at odds with individual privacy. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has been criticized for unfairly picking out Middle Eastern travelers and trans people, and now it’s in the spotlight again for expanding its <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/12/02/tsa-security-face-recognition/" target=_blank>controversial facial-scanning program</a>. Clear, which says it has more than 20 million members, works like the TSA’s PreCheck program by letting subscribers move through security quicker. But the service comes with some concerns for consumers.

Clear collects biometrics and health details such as your vaccine status to perform its services. It also forces customers to sign an agreement that prohibits them from suing the company in court or joining a class-action lawsuit.

Are the benefits of Clear worth the costs? How does it stack up to other time-saving measures? Here’s what The Washington Post Help Desk found:

Like <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/travel/tips/tsa-precheck-global-entry-clear-better/" target=_blank>TSA PreCheck and Global Entry</a>, Clear makes wait times at airports shorter at airports by ushering paying customers past long security lines. It’s available at more than 50 U.S. airports, <a href="https://www.clearme.com/where-we-are" target=_blank>listed here</a>.

Clear has two offerings for air travelers: Plus and Reserve. With Plus, you pay $199 per year to verify your identity at the airport with biometrics such as your iris or fingerprint instead of waiting for a TSA agent to scan your ID. Plus subscribers check in at a separate Clear kiosk then walk to the front of the security line for physical scanning. (Although after <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/transportation/2023/07/12/tsa-airport-screening-clear-checkpoints/" target="_blank">a July 2022 security incident</a> prompted an advisory letter from the TSA to Clear and its partner airports, more Clear subscribers are subject to random ID checks from TSA employees.)

If you pay for Plus, children under 18 can accompany you at no cost, and you can add up to three adult friends or family members to your account for $119 each per year.

Clear’s Reserve tier is free — you just claim a spot online or in Clear’s app by providing your departing airport, flight information and the approximate time you’ll show up. Upon arrival, you’ll head straight to a designated checkpoint and scan <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/10/07/are-qr-codes-safe/" target=_blank>a QR code</a> on your phone to skip the general security line. A TSA agent will still check your ID. There are <a href="https://www.clearme.com/reserve" target=_blank>17 participating airports</a> in the United States, Canada and Europe.

More than 200 airports, and 99 percent of members waited less than 10 minutes to pass through security, according to the TSA’s website. There are about 40 million people qualified to use PreCheck lines, including active duty military and members of other DHS <a href="https://ttp.cbp.dhs.gov/" target=_blank>Trusted Traveler program</a>.

PreCheck costs around $78 every five years and requires an <a href="https://tsaenrollmentbyidemia.tsa.dhs.gov/" target=_blank>application</a>, background check, fingerprints and an in-person interview. PreCheck customers get their own designated line, which tends to move faster than the general checkpoints because they don’t have to remove their shoes, belts or electronics.

You can be a member of Clear and PreCheck at the same time for an even speedier airport experience, though this hack won’t work if too many people sign up.

Why are people concerned about airport biometrics?

Compared to other forms of data collection, biometrics such as facial, iris and or thumbprint scans have greater potential for invasive surveillance or discrimination, privacy advocates say. Facial recognition, for instance, makes it difficult to protect your privacy in public spaces — law enforcement has already used it to <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/10/06/police-facial-recognition-secret-false-arrest/" target=_blank>arrest hundreds of Americans</a>, many of whom didn’t know about the technology’s role in their cases. And the technology isn’t always trustworthy, particularly when identifying racial minorities. At least six Black Americans have been <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/10/06/police-facial-recognition-secret-false-arrest/" target=_blank>wrongfully arrested</a> due to faulty facial recognition.

Facial recognition at airports arguably comes with fewer risks than facial scanning during job interviews or criminal investigations. Both Clear and the TSA say they’re not using your biometrics for purposes other than running and evaluating their programs.

But civil rights experts warn against normalizing the use of facial scanning, especially by the federal government. Others have criticized the TSA for not clearly communicating the rules around facial scanning. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Oregon) <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/07/11/tsa-airport-security-facial-recognition/" target=_blank>told The Post</a>’s Shira Ovide that when he tried to opt out of a voluntary TSA facial scan, he was told that doing so would cause a significant delay for himself and other travelers.

Monica Rodman

How do Clear’s privacy practices stack up?

Clear collects some potentially sensitive data from its customers, including iris and fingerprint images that uniquely identify you. It also stores your vaccine status if you opt into its <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/07/31/covid-vaccine-card-phone/" target=_blank>Health Pass feature</a>.

Clear never shares your biometrics with outside companies, according to spokeswoman Annabel Walsh. It also doesn’t share data or inferences about your health, finances or behavior with outside marketing or advertising companies, she said. When Clear does share data outside the company, it requires its partners to sign contracts promising to only use your information to perform services for Clear, Walsh added.

While Clear stores your data indefinitely, it accepts <a href="https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/09/26/ask-company-delete-personal-data/" target=_blank>data deletion requests</a> from consumers even if they live in states without privacy laws, Walsh said.

Clear’s privacy practices seem better than many. But any time you trust a company or the government with your data, you risk security breaches and potential misuse.

What legal caveats am I agreeing to by signing up for Clear?

Clear subscribers sign <a href="https://www.clearme.com/member-terms" target=_blank>member agreements</a> that include important legal fine print. By signing, you waive your right to sue the company in court or enter a class-action lawsuit — even if Clear violated its privacy promises or other terms.

This carve out — known by critics as a “forced arbitration clause” — isn’t unique to Clear. But it’s worth a raised eyebrow, said Deborah Hensler, a professor at Stanford Law School who teaches courses on arbitration law. By compelling unhappy or wronged customers to deal with an arbiter rather than a traditional judge or jury, the company puts itself at an automatic advantage should something go wrong, she said.

“You and I as consumers didn’t negotiate this clause,” Hensler said, “And ordinary people don’t know what it means.”

Companies invented arbitration clauses to keep disputes with customers or employees out of the courts, Hensler said. As litigation against companies became increasingly common in the early 2000s, companies started throwing in bans on class-action suits, as well. While many other countries disallowed the practice, U.S. courts let corporations continue with so-called forced arbitration.

“This is common practice among companies providing consumer services,” Clear’s Walsh said. “Disputes are few and far between, and when they do happen, we try to resolve them on an individual basis.”

Hensler said she has signed a handful of non-arbitration clauses in her dealings with service companies — after all, the terms for consumers are to “take it or leave it.” But it’s worth a careful read and extra consideration, especially when you’re signing up with a company that collects biometrics or other sensitive data.

Xavier University, BA in economics

Tatum Hunter writes about personal technology and its impact on our wallets, brains and environment. She joined The Washington Post from Built In, where she covered software and the tech workforce.

Tatum Hunter

washpost

TSA PreCheck vs. Clear: Which is better for cost, privacy to travel?

the-washington-post

US-HOLIDAY-TRAVEL

AFP/Getty Images

Tech in Your Life

Your Data and Privacy

Internet Access

What's New

Ethical Issues

Ask a Question

Help Desk

prism://prism.query/site,/technology/consumer-tech/data-privacy&limit=20

prism://prism.query/site,/technology/consumer-tech&limit=20

prism://prism.query/two-sites,/technology,/politics/powerpost/the-technology-202?limit=20